Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2024 2:16:55 GMT
We have DaveU who insists that Nick's eyesight or anybody else's come to that, could not possibly have seen the ball go over the line, even though it was judged to be a goal by the lino and ref.
Nearly every right thinking person who has seen the photographic evidence, supports that view as well.
Apparently DaveU couldn't make his mind up either in real time or afterwards. In his head it was all too inconclusive.
Yet he feels compelled to argue that those who viewed it clearly and called it a goal are somehow in the wrong.
It gets curiouser and curiouser.
It’s as if this is a weird social experiment to see how long they can keep at it
We know exactly how long they can keep at it. Do you not remember the DaveU vs hbs spats of a few years ago? They went on for weeks!