|
Post by Fed up with PC views only on Feb 24, 2020 11:41:24 GMT
Highlights seem to indicate we should have had a penalty but also that they scored before they scored, and Iffy Allen was lucky to stay on the pitch - twice! All irrelevant now though! I have no problem with the penalty decision, only 1 or maybe2 refs out of 10 would gave give it. If it had been against us there would have been uproar from our support if it had been given. I it had been against us at the Gallagher it would definitely have been given, Swordy! Know what you mean, though.
|
|
|
Post by nws on Feb 24, 2020 12:12:40 GMT
1.1m birds and animals are killed a year by plastics Answer me this nws. Why is it that seagulls with a whole sea full of fish to eat always decide to nick my chips instead? And before anyone moans about me going off topic ,this is a highlights thread and I am just highlighting this point. Tying my fact and your question together, I am interested to know why you are eating plastic chips! This might help you in your quest for knowledge. It's not political so you might read it. urbanseagullcontrol.co.uk/2019/07/09/so-boris-why-do-seagulls-nick-our-chips/
|
|
|
Post by soulstone on Feb 24, 2020 18:11:33 GMT
Defo penalty for me as his hand was very high. Had it been by his waist I think it would have been okay.
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Feb 24, 2020 19:37:33 GMT
Highlights seem to indicate we should have had a penalty but also that they scored before they scored, and Iffy Allen was lucky to stay on the pitch - twice! All irrelevant now though! Not sure how you can tell from the angle of the highlight whether that was in. The linesman was virtually level with it and he didn't give it. That's good enough for me. But then I don't spend my time on this forum trying to make out everything is ten times worse than it actually is.
|
|
|
Post by 61666 on Feb 24, 2020 22:31:17 GMT
Wishart twice did well to clear off the line, while Watters was just offside. Looks a clear penalty in the second half, but the result says otherwise. Meanwhile, were both Allen and Amaluzor looking for three games off? That would certainly have made a selection headache...
|
|
|
Post by Fed up with PC views only on Feb 25, 2020 8:34:03 GMT
Wishart twice did well to clear off the line, while Watters was just offside. Looks a clear penalty in the second half, but the result says otherwise. Meanwhile, were both Allen and Amaluzor looking for three games off? That would certainly have made a selection headache... Allen was a very lucky boy - he seemed to be the one who “floored” the opponent and could have got a straight red. It shows the players do have passion - it just needs to be directed - especially gir Justins case as he is genuinely talented - in the right way with the right tactics and we could have a winning run in to the end of the season. I’m sure JS2 and HH are working on it!
|
|
|
Post by jdl on Feb 25, 2020 23:09:30 GMT
Wishart's foot was touching the line, so I don't see how much of the ball can have been over it.
Lovely comment from Fred, "Once again fate vomits on our eiderdown". He ought to write for PP...
|
|
|
Post by sword65 on Feb 27, 2020 22:38:40 GMT
I think I have now beaten ned's record oo the last post on threads.
|
|
|
Post by pwoodstone on Feb 27, 2020 22:41:46 GMT
Wishart's foot was touching the line, so I don't see how much of the ball can have been over it. Lovely comment from Fred, "Once again fate vomits on our eiderdown". He ought to write for PP... Blackadder quote
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Feb 28, 2020 9:48:07 GMT
I think I have now beaten ned's record oo the last post on threads. Is Ned your new adopted name for NWS.
|
|
|
Post by sword65 on Feb 28, 2020 10:05:51 GMT
I think I have now beaten ned's record oo the last post on threads. Is Ned your new adopted name for NWS. No I was just pissed and didnt notice the spell checker had changed it.🤣
|
|
|
Post by Fed up with PC views only on Feb 28, 2020 10:12:56 GMT
Is Ned your new adopted name for NWS. No I was just pissed and didnt notice the spell checker had changed it.🤣 Ned is a bit equine isn't it. We know he's a political animal, but, a horse?
|
|
|
Post by sword65 on Feb 28, 2020 10:25:58 GMT
No I was just pissed and didnt notice the spell checker had changed it.🤣 Ned is a bit equine isn't it. We know he's a political animal, but, a horse? An old nag who nags everyone🤣
|
|
|
Post by jdl on Feb 28, 2020 11:22:03 GMT
Ned is a bit equine isn't it. We know he's a political animal, but, a horse? An old nag who nags everyone🤣 Or an ass?
|
|
|
Post by Fed up with PC views only on Feb 28, 2020 12:28:04 GMT
An old nag who nags everyone🤣 Or an ass? Come on chaps, don't be mean - time to drop the dead Donkey...…………..
|
|