Hypocrites

[Deleted]

I ain’t pretended nothing mate. I’m just saying you keep biting. As for Rob, I’m not really interested

[Deleted]

Positively gulping..... like it

[Deleted]

Apr 30, 2019 16:28:10 GMT nws said:

Apr 30, 2019 15:56:38 GMT shamstone said:

See nws has had another little nibble 🎣

That's all you've got left when I continually run rings round your incorrect and nonsense argument...pretend it was all a wind up. If I'm nibbling you are positively gulping when Rob gets on the board.

One paragraph doesn't make a paper nws which is a shame really as then the rain forests might have a chance of out living the hippo. And as for the first bit ,providing the paper isn't lying ,it must grate you awfully knowing one of your main arguments for staying is not as strong as you would like though you would probably prefer financial disaster to being wrong. Finally as for running a ring around me your too late the marathon was on Sunday .

[Deleted]

Sword. I think he was referring running rings around me. That ain’t a problem though

[Deleted]

I’ll be positive and gulp

[Deleted]

Ah The recognised bastion of reasoned and accurate reporting full of facts otherwise known as the Daily Express only ever outdone by the Sunday Sport and only then when they find World War II Bombers on the moon.

I suspect you believe in unicorns as well

[Deleted]

Apr 30, 2019 19:13:00 GMT @stonewall said:

Ah The recognised bastion of reasoned and accurate reporting full of facts otherwise known as the Daily Express only ever outdone by the Sunday Sport and only then when they find World War II Bombers on the moon.

I suspect you believe in unicorns as well

Absolutely my dad worked for them. Hold on that was Unigate ,sorry!

[Deleted]

Apr 30, 2019 17:50:13 GMT shamstone said:

I’ll be positive and gulp

Four posts in 12 hours to show us how unbothered you are. OK you're not bothered

[Deleted]

Apr 30, 2019 17:30:04 GMT sword65 said:

Apr 30, 2019 16:28:10 GMT nws said:

That's all you've got left when I continually run rings round your incorrect and nonsense argument...pretend it was all a wind up. If I'm nibbling you are positively gulping when Rob gets on the board.

One paragraph doesn't make a paper nws which is a shame really as then the rain forests might have a chance of out living the hippo. And as for the first bit ,providing the paper isn't lying ,it must grate you awfully knowing one of your main arguments for staying is not as strong as you would like though you would probably prefer financial disaster to being wrong. Finally as for running a ring around me your too late the marathon was on Sunday .

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. Did I claim you read the whole paper. It is evident that it is often just the sensationalist headlines that get read and you can read these things online.


"providing the paper isn't lying"...I did chuckle at that bit. Why would newspapers that have claimed that the EU was banning bent bananas and rocking horses lie?


Inward investment is interesting. It seems nice because all these companies/individuals come and splash lots of lolly about and jobs are created, as a result. The trouble is that this can have the effect of forcing out firms that are fully British-based with the effect of taking resulting profits out of the UK rather than retaining them in the UK. Eventually, as we see in the energy sector we become a society that is somewhat reliant on foreign firms who can just ramp up their prices if they want or just leave and leave the mess behind them.


So to sum up...you don't welcome foreign people coming to work FOR the UK but you do welcome foreign people coming to own the means of production and the UK working FOR them....whoever said Brexiters make no sense or don't understand is beyond me and what was that about vassal?

Have a gander at this from the FT

www.ft.com/content/6f71229d-d74d-34fa-a30d-39e4ac07de8b

On the rain forest...I'd watch Climate Change: The Facts with David Attenborough if I were you. It gives the general points of the book I was gabbling on about (This Uninhabitable Planet). Brexit etc is not our biggest worry.

[Deleted]

May 1, 2019 8:48:34 GMT nws said:

Apr 30, 2019 17:30:04 GMT sword65 said:

One paragraph doesn't make a paper nws which is a shame really as then the rain forests might have a chance of out living the hippo. And as for the first bit ,providing the paper isn't lying ,it must grate you awfully knowing one of your main arguments for staying is not as strong as you would like though you would probably prefer financial disaster to being wrong. Finally as for running a ring around me your too late the marathon was on Sunday .

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. Did I claim you read the whole paper. It is evident that it is often just the sensationalist headlines that get read and you can read these things online.


"providing the paper isn't lying"...I did chuckle at that bit. Why would newspapers that have claimed that the EU was banning bent bananas and rocking horses lie?


Inward investment is interesting. It seems nice because all these companies/individuals come and splash lots of lolly about and jobs are created, as a result. The trouble is that this can have the effect of forcing out firms that are fully British-based with the effect of taking resulting profits out of the UK rather than retaining them in the UK. Eventually, as we see in the energy sector we become a society that is somewhat reliant on foreign firms who can just ramp up their prices if they want or just leave and leave the mess behind them.


So to sum up...you don't welcome foreign people coming to work FOR the UK but you do welcome foreign people coming to own the means of production and the UK working FOR them....whoever said Brexiters make no sense or don't understand is beyond me and what was that about vassal?

Have a gander at this from the FT

www.ft.com/content/6f71229d-d74d-34fa-a30d-39e4ac07de8b

On the rain forest...I'd watch Climate Change: The Facts with David Attenborough if I were you. It gives the general points of the book I was gabbling on about (This Uninhabitable Planet). Brexit etc is not our biggest worry.

I think if you flip back a few posts you did accuse me of being a fraud who read the Daily Express. I can say with all honesty apart from the NLP and the Tonbridge Times I haven't read a newspaper since my dear mother died which will be 2 years tomorrow as I really can't be bothered with them. I do have an objection to being called a fraud as that infers that I am a liar and though I have many,many faults i dont count that as one of them as there are enough people in this world that do that and are far better at it than i would probably be. Your turn and lets see if you can start without mentioning the word oh and dear.

[Deleted]

So you proved yourself not to be a fraud by presenting me with "evidence" from the publication I claimed you were reading and you said you didn't. Er...ok you are not a fraud?


Your go and let's see if you can have a go at any of the factual points of your much-trumpeted inward investment rather than the emotional bits around where you get your info.

[Deleted]

May 1, 2019 9:22:21 GMT nws said:

So you proved yourself not to be a fraud by presenting me with "evidence" from the publication I claimed you were reading and you said you didn't. Er...ok you are not a fraud?


Your go and let's see if you can have a go at any of the factual points of your much-trumpeted inward investment rather than the emotional bits around where you get your info.

Is there any point as you will only disagree with me in fact I am positive if I agreed with everything you say you would still say that I am wrong . I read one paragraph and you have the paper boy delivering to me on a daily basis it was one paragraph less than 50 words ,that's 2000 words less than the average llcoolj post . Just to make things perfectly clear, if you nws bought me a copy and hand delivered it to me on a silver platter complete with a glass of chilled lager I still wouldn't read it.

[Deleted]

May 1, 2019 11:22:28 GMT sword65 said:

May 1, 2019 9:22:21 GMT nws said:

So you proved yourself not to be a fraud by presenting me with "evidence" from the publication I claimed you were reading and you said you didn't. Er...ok you are not a fraud?


Your go and let's see if you can have a go at any of the factual points of your much-trumpeted inward investment rather than the emotional bits around where you get your info.

Is there any point as you will only disagree with me in fact I am positive if I agreed with everything you say you would still say that I am wrong . I read one paragraph and you have the paper boy delivering to me on a daily basis it was one paragraph less than 50 words ,that's 2000 words less than the average llcoolj post . Just to make things perfectly clear, if you nws bought me a copy and hand delivered it to me on a silver platter complete with a glass of chilled lager I still wouldn't read it.

So, to summarise.

You don't wish to comment on the factual points of inward investment because you believe I will disagree with you yet you presented your point in order to disagree with me. How strange.

Despite me saying something quite to the contrary about your reading of the Daily Express you still try and punt the point that I have you reading the whole paper.


As an addition to the summarisation I might note that your earlier claim that I called you a fraud who read the Daily Express was not true either. I said that your claim not to read the Daily Express was fraudulent. Quite a difference. Thankfully your quoting from the Daily Express proved that to be incorrect...

[Deleted]

May 1, 2019 13:32:19 GMT nws said:

May 1, 2019 11:22:28 GMT sword65 said:

Is there any point as you will only disagree with me in fact I am positive if I agreed with everything you say you would still say that I am wrong . I read one paragraph and you have the paper boy delivering to me on a daily basis it was one paragraph less than 50 words ,that's 2000 words less than the average llcoolj post . Just to make things perfectly clear, if you nws bought me a copy and hand delivered it to me on a silver platter complete with a glass of chilled lager I still wouldn't read it.

So, to summarise.

You don't wish to comment on the factual points of inward investment because you believe I will disagree with you yet you presented your point in order to disagree with me. How strange.

Despite me saying something quite to the contrary about your reading of the Daily Express you still try and punt the point that I have you reading the whole paper.


As an addition to the summarisation I might note that your earlier claim that I called you a fraud who read the Daily Express was not true either. I said that your claim not to read the Daily Express was fraudulent. Quite a difference. Thankfully your quoting from the Daily Express proved that to be incorrect...

I never repeat never said I wasn't strange in fact that is one of my better points.

[Deleted]

May 1, 2019 8:48:34 GMT nws said:

Apr 30, 2019 17:30:04 GMT sword65 said:

One paragraph doesn't make a paper nws which is a shame really as then the rain forests might have a chance of out living the hippo. And as for the first bit ,providing the paper isn't lying ,it must grate you awfully knowing one of your main arguments for staying is not as strong as you would like though you would probably prefer financial disaster to being wrong. Finally as for running a ring around me your too late the marathon was on Sunday .

Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. Did I claim you read the whole paper. It is evident that it is often just the sensationalist headlines that get read and you can read these things online.


"providing the paper isn't lying"...I did chuckle at that bit. Why would newspapers that have claimed that the EU was banning bent bananas and rocking horses lie?


Inward investment is interesting. It seems nice because all these companies/individuals come and splash lots of lolly about and jobs are created, as a result. The trouble is that this can have the effect of forcing out firms that are fully British-based with the effect of taking resulting profits out of the UK rather than retaining them in the UK. Eventually, as we see in the energy sector we become a society that is somewhat reliant on foreign firms who can just ramp up their prices if they want or just leave and leave the mess behind them.


So to sum up...you don't welcome foreign people coming to work FOR the UK but you do welcome foreign people coming to own the means of production and the UK working FOR them....whoever said Brexiters make no sense or don't understand is beyond me and what was that about vassal?

Have a gander at this from the FT

www.ft.com/content/6f71229d-d74d-34fa-a30d-39e4ac07de8b

On the rain forest...I'd watch Climate Change: The Facts with David Attenborough if I were you. It gives the general points of the book I was gabbling on about (This Uninhabitable Planet). Brexit etc is not our biggest worry.

Man. You don’t half like the sound of your own voice