|
Havant
Feb 28, 2016 20:51:00 GMT
Ant likes this
Post by jdl on Feb 28, 2016 20:51:00 GMT
Ant - I wasn't there yesterday. Surely it can't have been as bad as the Basingstoke match ( Away). I wouldn't know. I could not make Basingstoke so wouldn't be able to comment on it. Surely you've seen a 15 second clip of the game though?
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 28, 2016 20:58:05 GMT
Post by nws on Feb 28, 2016 20:58:05 GMT
Ant - I wasn't there yesterday. Surely it can't have been as bad as the Basingstoke match ( Away). Nowehere near as bad
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 28, 2016 21:13:28 GMT
Post by Sennockian69 on Feb 28, 2016 21:13:28 GMT
Ant - I wasn't there yesterday. Surely it can't have been as bad as the Basingstoke match ( Away). Nowehere near as bad Thanks. The injury to Coyle is very bad news.
|
|
|
Post by islandstone on Feb 28, 2016 21:33:09 GMT
Having looked at the amazingly insightful logic put forward by Mr Senna, I am now in complete agreement with every word he has said. Please can he inform the rest of us how he manages to be completely right every time? I can't explain it. The last time i was wrong was in 1987, but if I'm honest, it was more of a misunderstanding than a mistake Are you Michael fish?
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 28, 2016 22:44:12 GMT
Post by jdl on Feb 28, 2016 22:44:12 GMT
Is that the people who weren't there who only have a few seconds of video to go on? I don't know if you're deliberately being facetious, but there's a link to the highlights that contain this incident unedited already provided elsewhere in this thread. It was that very link that I was discussing in the original post (Ant sneakily never quotes posts, so replies to his posts frequently get confusing!).
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 28, 2016 23:42:40 GMT
Post by nws on Feb 28, 2016 23:42:40 GMT
Thanks. The injury to Coyle is very bad news. I agree that Coyle's injury is very poor news. Let us hope that he makes a full recovery in good time.
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 28, 2016 23:43:03 GMT
via mobile
Post by senna34165 on Feb 28, 2016 23:43:03 GMT
I can't explain it. The last time i was wrong was in 1987, but if I'm honest, it was more of a misunderstanding than a mistake Are you Michael fish? Yes I am. And they didn't loose all the oaks in Sevenoaks ??
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 28, 2016 23:57:30 GMT
Post by nws on Feb 28, 2016 23:57:30 GMT
Is that the people who weren't there who only have a few seconds of video to go on? I don't know if you're deliberately being facetious, but there's a link to the highlights that contain this incident unedited already provided elsewhere in this thread. Thanks for pointing that out, HS1. I now realise that the fat cheating number 10 provided both crosses. It was bad enough when I thought he had provided the winner!
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 29, 2016 1:27:08 GMT
Post by jdl on Feb 29, 2016 1:27:08 GMT
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 29, 2016 9:06:41 GMT
Post by daveu on Feb 29, 2016 9:06:41 GMT
That has to be the best one yet. Brilliant
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 29, 2016 9:14:15 GMT
Post by nws on Feb 29, 2016 9:14:15 GMT
I think La Femme should honour this one by printing it on supersoft paper to help pmh enjoy it as well
|
|
|
Post by shatty on Feb 29, 2016 10:18:27 GMT
Haven't posted on her for ages and after the first page of this thread it's easy to see why, absolute sh*t c#nts......
|
|
|
Post by tim on Feb 29, 2016 10:53:00 GMT
Having looked at the amazingly insightful logic put forward by Mr Senna, I am now in complete agreement with every word he has said. Please can he inform the rest of us how he manages to be completely right every time? You do realise that Senna and NWS are the same person dont you? NWS always posts as Senna when he has one of his tourette attacks!
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 29, 2016 12:20:23 GMT
Post by nws on Feb 29, 2016 12:20:23 GMT
Having looked at the amazingly insightful logic put forward by Mr Senna, I am now in complete agreement with every word he has said. Please can he inform the rest of us how he manages to be completely right every time? You do realise that Senna and NWS are the same person dont you? NWS always posts as Senna when he has one of his tourette attacks! Oh please Timothy. The NWS brand does not do cheap imitations. An NWS post comes with the hallmark of quality (as recognised by the Guild of Professional Messageboarders and The Royal Society of Messageboarders). Any further attempts to debase the NWS brand with lies and innuendo will result in protective action being taken.
|
|
|
Havant
Feb 29, 2016 12:24:08 GMT
Post by nws on Feb 29, 2016 12:24:08 GMT
Haven't posted on her for ages and after the first page of this thread it's easy to see why, absolute sh*t c#nts...... Have to agree with your sentiments, Shatty (although the language is a little 'terse'). Start at page 3 because you will start to get a better quality arriving. It has the hallmark.
|
|