Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2024 4:52:14 GMT
Sadly the correct decision about Southend. You can’t have clubs starting who can’t pay wages, regularly go into administration, and spending eternity on the brink of a takeover that never happens. It might even force the current owner to finally move on.
Am I right in remembering it was Maidstone’s demise that made the Football League bring in a £1 million bond for new entrants?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2024 6:14:08 GMT
Dunno, what’s the answer?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2024 7:35:35 GMT
And if they are kicked out, who replaces them? Am guessing nobody, though could the side relegated with the most points get a reprieve? Adding a replacement would cause all manner of problems, you'd think.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2024 8:02:55 GMT
The sensible thing would be for the NL to play with one short and one fewer relegated at the end of the season so only 3 relegated.
|
|
|
|
Post by applesnstones on Jun 25, 2024 14:19:25 GMT
The sensible thing would be for the NL to play with one short and one fewer relegated at the end of the season so only 3 relegated. Sensible, but will let off some clubs (yet again) who have teetered over that edge! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2024 15:03:29 GMT
The sensible thing would be for the NL to play with one short and one fewer relegated at the end of the season so only 3 relegated. Since when has the National league hierarchy been sensible. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 25, 2024 17:08:30 GMT
If Southend fail to convince the league that they are viable, I wonder if any players may find there way to Maidstone. a keeper perhaps?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2024 14:39:01 GMT
I've no time at all for Southend - the bastards tried to stop us going up in 89, and treated us like shite.
But you have to feel for their supporters - if they haven't had that 10 points deducted last season, they's have been in the play-offs, and might even have been promoted.
Although, I remain confused as to how a club that spent most of the season teetering on the edge of financial collapse, had a long-term transfer embargo, and frequently couldn't pay players and staff manages to play that well...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2024 15:45:04 GMT
Would the EFL have allowed them up?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2024 22:41:29 GMT
This is really shitty of Wolves, Maidenhead were due 8 million, but Wolves made them drop the 20% sell on clause so they only have to give them 4 million
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2024 15:04:00 GMT
As a Wolves supporter, I am disgusted, it seems so disrespectful to non league. As a lawyer, I’d say we don’t have enough detail of the issues at stake to make a sound judgement. Luckily I put a soft covering onto my fence.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2024 11:33:27 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2024 11:51:30 GMT
It had to happen soon and with all the extra EFL games scheduled there will be football every night of the week so TNT probably think that NL games will not be watched. No viewers = no advertisers = no money. I wonder how many clubs in all 3 divisions have already spent their expected annual TV allowance and or money expectedfor live games.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2024 12:01:09 GMT
Will TNT and NL management compensate us for the money spent on new tv gantry that THEY insisted on
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 19, 2024 14:57:47 GMT
Will TNT and NL management compensate us for the money spent on new tv gantry that THEY insisted on No. Just a wild guess... |
|
