Unlike you I don't skip between topics looking back at the minutiae of everything I've ever posted. Hence I can post saying I can't make HB on Tuesday and a few minutes later, not even be thinking about Tuesday's game when reading what at first sight appeared to be an unrelated topic. You need to get a life mate, instead of looking for any excuse to start an argument. And when people offet an explanation for something .perhaps you should consider that it might be true rather than calling them a liar.
I have started an argument?
Let's put the facts in order.
SATURDAY
I posted on the thread, 'Herne Bay, who's going?' and spoke about us not being too troubled based on what I saw for half an hour today.
You post at 18-25 saying you are not going to the Herne Bay game on the thread, 'Herne Bay, whos going?'
You post at 18-30 to ask why a post about Herne Bay is irrelevant
JDL posted at 18-52 to ask if it might be about next Tuesday's game
Kieran posted at 19-30 to say it was because we are playing Herne Bay
You posted at 21-35 to say that the reason for posting was tenuous
You posted at 22-42 on a thread entitled 'At least Margate lost'
SUNDAY
At 8-39am you posted to say that the title of the post was what caused you to think the post was not relevant and if I had used a different title you would have seen the relevance
You posted at 8-41 to say that you have had your say on people's obsession with Margate and you ignore Margate topics
At around midnight you posted to say that my arguments were ego driven
MONDAY
At around 8-00 you posted to say that I could not know what was in your mind when you were posting.
So, if you were not trying to start an argument here are some points to think about.
1. How did you manage to forget our next opponents in the space of five minutes, even though you had spoken about it on a thread - in which I had commented about us not being troubled by them based on what I saw that day - and my post was all about them?
2. At what point overnight between Saturday and Sunday did you suddeny decide that the post had gone from tenuous to relevant?
3. Whay did you comment that the title of the post was all important in leading you to decide that the post was irrelevant yet, on the same night, post on a different thread entitled, 'At least Margate Lost'?
4. Why did you post on the thread entitled, 'At least Margate lost' and then say you ignore Margate topics?
5. Why did you claim my arguments were ego driven and then subsequently complain that I could not know what was in your mind when you were posting?
I have a life thank you. I spend plenty of time with my kids and work with kids so I am very busy. I am also confused as to why you think my posting on here to REPLY to your attacks means I have no life but your continued attack over this topic means you have a life. I am confused as to how I have looked to start an argument when all I did was post something about our next opponents and then face a contuining, ever-changing and very contradictary argument about the relevance of my post to the section it is in from someone who's previous two threads were about a non-Maidstone United website and himswearing at some other supporters/officials. I think it is the contradictary nature of the postings that have led me to believe that you may not be telling the truth over understanding why I made my original post.
I hope that helps but if you wish to continue and then somehow try to, laughably, tell someone that you are defending yourself then crack on.
