|
|
Post by Loftus Road Stone. on Nov 23, 2014 18:54:43 GMT
As our next opposition of coarse its of interest.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 19:16:13 GMT
Interesting opening post. Do you think fringe players and youths will be up to the job? Yes. I do. I think we have a very good set up which includes strength in depth and, seemingly, at youth level. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 19:16:10 GMT
Ade, if you had initially used the current title then I would've recognised the relevance. Since I wasn't really thinking about next Tuesday when I read it, I'm afraid it just didn't occur to me. As I said on another topic, you shouldn't just assume that everyone knows your mind when you post something. That makes little sense. When people said what the relevance was your comment was that the reason was tenuous. Now you say that it has relevance because the title has been changed. On your reasoning it is confusing to see why you have posted on a thread entitled 'At least Margate lost' without complaining that it should have been in a different section. You just can't leave it alone, can you?! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 19:17:52 GMT
Usually I get bored of NWS drivel but on this occasion I have to say it is relevent as we are playing them next. Someone put on the message board about Wreham drawing losing etc, that's not any different. I was going to 'like' this, but I couldn't get past the "bored of". I suspect I am already on the dark side... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 21:18:11 GMT
That makes little sense. When people said what the relevance was your comment was that the reason was tenuous. Now you say that it has relevance because the title has been changed. On your reasoning it is confusing to see why you have posted on a thread entitled 'At least Margate lost' without complaining that it should have been in a different section. You just can't leave it alone, can you?! No |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 21:40:44 GMT
Ade, if you had initially used the current title then I would've recognised the relevance. Since I wasn't really thinking about next Tuesday when I read it, I'm afraid it just didn't occur to me. As I said on another topic, you shouldn't just assume that everyone knows your mind when you post something. That makes little sense. When people said what the relevance was your comment was that the reason was tenuous. Now you say that it has relevance because the title has been changed. On your reasoning it is confusing to see why you have posted on a thread entitled 'At least Margate lost' without complaining that it should have been in a different section. Wo, nws I put a lot o effort putting that thread together and has relevance. Margate are title rivals, therefore their results are 100% relevant. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 22:49:49 GMT
That makes little sense. When people said what the relevance was your comment was that the reason was tenuous. Now you say that it has relevance because the title has been changed. On your reasoning it is confusing to see why you have posted on a thread entitled 'At least Margate lost' without complaining that it should have been in a different section. Wo, nws I put a lot o effort putting that thread together and has relevance. Margate are title rivals, therefore their results are 100% relevant. I am not knocking your thread, Kieran, merely pointing out the inconsistency of Dave U's argument. I fully appreciate the relevance of your thread. |
|
|
|
Post by frankinstone on Nov 23, 2014 23:08:13 GMT
unfortunately K if every thread had relevance it would have 20 odd pages of interesting banter ....
(note;none of our furry friends were harmed in the typing of this sentence)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 23:32:18 GMT
Wo, nws I put a lot o effort putting that thread together and has relevance. Margate are title rivals, therefore their results are 100% relevant. I am not knocking your thread, Kieran, merely pointing out the inconsistency of Dave U's argument. I fully appreciate the relevance of your thread. I've explained why I thought your topic was irrelevant, you just choose to ignore it, as you always do when something doesn't fit with you pathetic ego driven arguments. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 23, 2014 23:51:21 GMT
I am not knocking your thread, Kieran, merely pointing out the inconsistency of Dave U's argument. I fully appreciate the relevance of your thread. I've explained why I thought your topic was irrelevant, you just choose to ignore it, as you always do when something doesn't fit with you pathetic ego driven arguments. The pathetic and ego-driven arguments are all yours because you are consistently claiming things that are incorrect and can be seen to be incorrect. You claim that you thought the topic was irrelevant because of the title being about a non-Maidstone United game yet, just over four hours later, posted on a thread with a title relating to a game that did not involve Maidstone United without any complaint about irrelevance. You claimed not to understand the relevance of the original posting Ok mate, you've lost me as well. Unless it's to do with former stones playing for Bay, but then that would mean the "Ex Stones, where are they now" topic should be in this section as well. You later claimed not to have been thinking about next Tuesday. I didn't think it was obvious. I wasn't thinking about next Tuesday so as far as I was concerned it was just a report on a game not involving Maidstone. You can't always expect everyone to know what you're thinking when you post something and then refuse to explain if they don't get it. That may have been a fair argument if it were not for the fact that you also made this comment on a thread entitled, 'Herne Bay Tuesday, Whos going?' Company Do Tuesday night so can't make this one. From the evidence we can see that at 6-25 you posted on a thread about going to watch Maidstone v Herne Bay on Tuesday but at 6-30 you couldn't see the relevance of a post about a Herne Bay game because, as you later claimed, you weren't thinking about Tuesday. That was some action-packed five minutes to forget things so easily. Now what were you saying about pathetic and ego-driven arguments? PS I have edited my original post to reflect your memory problems |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2014 7:35:56 GMT
As I said before, you couldn't know what was in my mind when I read you post, so just for once, just give up with the narcissistic rubbish and admit you were wrong.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2014 7:47:19 GMT
So you can decide that my comments are ego driven and narcissistic with no proof whatsoever but I can supply reasonable proof to show that you are just making reasons up for your apparent 'misunderstanding'. OK
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2014 13:58:36 GMT
So you can decide that my comments are ego driven and narcissistic with no proof whatsoever but I can supply reasonable proof to show that you are just making reasons up for your apparent 'misunderstanding'. OK What I did or didn't post in another topic is completely irrelevant. When I read your herne bay report it didn't even occur to me that you were posting in reference to Tuesday's game. You mention Herne Bay quite a lot lately and I just though it was another of those occasions. You then got arsey and refused to explain the relevance, and then a few post later merely claimed that because other people could see it so should I, which to be fair once I had read those posts I did. I subsequently explained my initial response but you refused (and still do) to accept that explanation, so the only conclusion I can draw is that you are, narcisitic, ego driven and completely incapable of admitting when you are wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by frankinstone on Nov 24, 2014 14:14:30 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 24, 2014 15:48:04 GMT
So you can decide that my comments are ego driven and narcissistic with no proof whatsoever but I can supply reasonable proof to show that you are just making reasons up for your apparent 'misunderstanding'. OK What I did or didn't post in another topic is completely irrelevant. When I read your herne bay report it didn't even occur to me that you were posting in reference to Tuesday's game. You mention Herne Bay quite a lot lately and I just though it was another of those occasions. You then got arsey and refused to explain the relevance, and then a few post later merely claimed that because other people could see it so should I, which to be fair once I had read those posts I did. I subsequently explained my initial response but you refused (and still do) to accept that explanation, so the only conclusion I can draw is that you are, narcisitic, ego driven and completely incapable of admitting when you are wrong. Oh dear, oh dear...your slow death on this is sad to see. You say that I 'got arsey and refused to explain the relevance' which thus means that you read my replies to jt. I refused to explain the reference direct although I did point him and others straight to it. I made this post. Roysty has helped you out. Roysty made one post that night (and indeed since 15th Nov). It was the one that started the thread entitled, 'Herne Bay whos going?'. You read and replied to Roysty's question so, once again, the mystery of how you could not deduce the relevance or, indeed, even simply go and look at what Roysty had posted is baffling to say the least. Still don't let the proof or supply of facts over your apparent wrongdoing get in the way. Just keep claiming otherwise and that I am narcissistic and ego driven. It is interesting that you now apparently accept the relevance once others saw it. What has changed because you continued to claim that it wasn't relevant enough? Now you seem to have accepted it. Slowly, slowly you changeth your tune, Mr U-turn. |
|
