|
Post by Nick on Nov 27, 2017 12:47:42 GMT
I think somebody is deliberately missing the point ! superego's are not generally overly sensitive to others feelings. if only a certain serial poster understood how annoying his posts were to the populace of the forum perhaps it would be a small step towards him doing it less often
|
|
|
Post by tim on Nov 27, 2017 13:19:33 GMT
Sorry Nick, I know NWS quite well He likes to annoy, if he knew how much he annoyed, he'd do it more Best to ignore him and hopes he get fed up!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2017 13:37:05 GMT
Philosophical question - if nws is annoying in a forest and DaveU is not around to hear him, is he still annoying?
|
|
|
Post by pedant on Nov 27, 2017 14:04:33 GMT
Philosophical question - if nws is annoying in a forest and DaveU is not around to hear him, is he still annoying? Non philosophical answer - "does anybody care?"
|
|
|
Post by jakeyboi on Nov 27, 2017 16:25:49 GMT
I,ll defend Nws here, I ,ve had my share of heated discussions on this forum with him over the years but in his defence he is one of a very small group on here that will admit to being wrong. Others just flick back there hair an pick another argument, or post a page full of useless stats that majority of people don,t really care about.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2017 17:44:24 GMT
Actually NWS quite obviously gets genuinely offended when people have a go at him on here. He is clearly a very sensitive soul who responds to criticism through bravado, politely lashing out and starting a tit for tat posting game with 'clever' comments that goes on and on and on, because like a dog with a bone he will never give it up until he thinks he has got the upper hand, or produced an end game with a smart comment or angle on the original argument that nobody else was intelligent enough to spot. He will disagree of course and probably likes the idea that some forum users think he is just making mischief, and that when you meet him he is a nice guy really. He has invited me to meet him in the past but I think I'll just give it a miss. Perhaps he is a nice guy, who knows but at the end of the day if you come on here and make yourself out to be a bit of a prat, that is what most will think of you.
|
|
|
Post by headstone on Nov 27, 2017 21:17:59 GMT
Philosophical question - if nws is annoying in a forest and DaveU is not around to hear him, is he still annoying? Better ask Schrodinger's cat....
|
|
|
Post by jdl on Nov 27, 2017 23:22:03 GMT
Philosophical question - if nws is annoying in a forest and DaveU is not around to hear him, is he still annoying? Better ask Schrodinger's cat.... I'd like to, but I can never find the bugger!
|
|
|
Post by nws on Nov 28, 2017 10:54:35 GMT
This argument works at an emotional level as well as linguistic The second part of the equation would be to consider which occurs first. Is the 'annoyer' being annoying or is the 'annoyee' looking to be annoyed. I would cite the strange case of pmh's departure and the subsequent rush to be annoyed by me as evidence. Some of us have always been annoyed by you 😁 As most appeared on Maidstone forums after me one would have to deduce that they were attracted towards me and thus looking to be annoyed. The most perfect example I can cite is my argument is my wife who is constantly annoyed with me yet chose to marry me of her own free will....we will discount the drugs, ropes and highly paid vicar
|
|
|
Post by nws on Nov 28, 2017 11:06:21 GMT
Actually NWS quite obviously gets genuinely offended when people have a go at him on here. He is clearly a very sensitive soul who responds to criticism through bravado, politely lashing out and starting a tit for tat posting game with 'clever' comments that goes on and on and on, because like a dog with a bone he will never give it up until he thinks he has got the upper hand, or produced an end game with a smart comment or angle on the original argument that nobody else was intelligent enough to spot. He will disagree of course and probably likes the idea that some forum users think he is just making mischief, and that when you meet him he is a nice guy really. He has invited me to meet him in the past but I think I'll just give it a miss. Perhaps he is a nice guy, who knows but at the end of the day if you come on here and make yourself out to be a bit of a prat, that is what most will think of you. You have offended my sensitive soul with this . Isn't it funny how you wade into this one with a bit of name-calling and then trying to create a caveat to bracket me if I dare to reply. Tit for tat arguments take two (not sure if you have spotted that) and if this were to develop into one you cannot really complain that I started it. This is so often the case but that wouldn't suit your little oh-so-superior psychological argument The one genuine thing I will say is that I will quite happily meet people. However, if you feel this forum is reality and you actually don't like me and don't want to meet me then don't. Just carry on like a whinnying horse and enjoy the fact that you think I am a bit of a prat and enjoy getting a bit rude towards me on the forum. After all it's what you are here for. I'll put you in the 'came here to be properly annoyed' bracket. Just to provide a good example of bracketing of you. Here is you in no way trying to start an argument Jay Saunders retweeted a tweet from a company who showed a video of Worgs in some sort of treatment capsule at their facility, the other day - the original tweet said it was to treat a groin strain. Do try to keep up, NWS!
|
|
|
Post by nws on Nov 28, 2017 11:15:26 GMT
I,ll defend Nws here, I ,ve had my share of heated discussions on this forum with him over the years but in his defence he is one of a very small group on here that will admit to being wrong. Others just flick back there hair an pick another argument, or post a page full of useless stats that majority of people don,t really care about. Thank you, JB. I fear you may be preaching to the unconvertible here. They came to be annoyed and offended and they can only get what they want if I remain annoying to them. No matter what you say they will flick back their hair, pretend they have something of interest to post and then crack on with boring people. I am astute enough to know the brackets of people. There are some I genuinely offend with a remark that was maybe not good and when I spot that I apologise and withdraw the post (leaving the apology in place). There are those that enjoy a bit board fisticuffs but will chat to me when we meet and know it is a bit of pub-like natter (Dave U and yourself are perfect examples of that). The rest that generally claim to be offended/bored/hate me etc etc are here just for that and that only. This was amply proven with the demise of pmh and the sudden need to have the nws of old on here. The correlation between pmh going and the arguments getting picked with me was amazing.
|
|
|
Post by nws on Nov 28, 2017 11:18:04 GMT
Sorry Nick, I know NWS quite well He likes to annoy, if he knew how much he annoyed, he'd do it more Best to ignore him and hopes he get fed up! After ten years of forum stuff...how is ignoring me going, Tim?
|
|