Pity the poor sods who went to West Ham

[Deleted]

More so than usual...

[Deleted]

If only that had been the result!

Was this just a fishing exercise??

[Deleted]

?

[Deleted]

Dec 24, 2017 11:28:18 GMT @ant said:

?

At the risk of being whooshed, I think he means that while a lot of goals were scored that day, that set of results bears little resemblance to the actual results. West Ham actually lost 8-2.

[Deleted]

One of Ant's oddest posts.

[Deleted]

If I'd gone to West Ham to see a goalless draw, and all the other games had those results, I'd feel like a poor sod who needed pity, and considered it worth sharing with others who may also have been unaware of the scorelines that day.

Altho, if as dave says, the scores aren't accurate, then massive apologies for an "odd" post.

[Deleted]

Dec 25, 2017 23:05:53 GMT @ant said:

If I'd gone to West Ham to see a goalless draw, and all the other games had those results, I'd feel like a poor sod who needed pity, and considered it worth sharing with others who may also have been unaware of the scorelines that day.

Altho, if as dave says, the scores aren't accurate, then massive apologies for an "odd" post.

www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-4065174/Boxing-Day-1963-saw-66-goals-10-games-including-Manchester-United-losing-6-1-Burnley-Fulham-scoring-10.html