smoky
Junior Member
Posts: 50
|
Post by smoky on Feb 7, 2014 17:44:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stonethecrow on Feb 7, 2014 18:28:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by toonarmy on Feb 7, 2014 18:33:52 GMT
Well that clears up the voting pattern, both the North and South voted yes, with 3 votes from the premier teams, the system is flawed beyond words
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2014 19:12:37 GMT
on that basis the conference south sides have no problem with us joining so the conference can change there rules for joining those leagues at least!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2014 19:22:37 GMT
I could take Doswell's comments more seriously had his club stood up and argued the case for 3G on the day of the vote
|
|
|
|
Post by tim on Feb 8, 2014 9:47:23 GMT
Totally agree, why propose a law change and not promote it at the meeting, madness!
|
|
|
|
Post by farawaystone on Feb 8, 2014 9:54:01 GMT
It is something to do with the Sutton rep at the meeting being unable to attend at the last minute.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2014 9:54:08 GMT
Think i read somewhere their spokesperson didnt arrive! Maybe whoever sutton had to vote for them was shy ah bless
|
|
|
|
Post by moley on Feb 8, 2014 11:00:49 GMT
It is something to do with the Sutton rep at the meeting being unable to attend at the last minute. In practical terms, may have made the score different but the result would have been the same. Any ideas which three conference prem clubs voted for? |
|
|
|
Post by steveh21 on Feb 8, 2014 12:54:54 GMT
I reckon two might have been Welling and Bromley judging by their chairmen's support on twitter. And their reserves are being 'allowed' to play on 3G in the Surburban League today:
Welling United v Bromley - Suburban League Shield (Reserve Team Fixture)
(3:00pm at 3G Samuel Mongagu, 122 Broad Walk, Kidbrooke, London SE3 8ND)
|
|
|
|
Post by islandstone on Feb 8, 2014 12:56:23 GMT
Good ol'bromers
|
|
