|
|
Post by hammerstone on Sept 5, 2017 10:25:31 GMT
So, after a disappointing performance against Hartlepool its important we respond with a re-juvinated approach being careful not to slip into a rot. In light of that, this is the team I would go out with:   As a few people mentioned already, i think this would give us a better defensive core. DSY sadly needs to watch from the bench, but wouldn't be adversed to him coming on and bagging a winner against his old side. ![]() |
|
|
|
Post by Nick on Sept 5, 2017 10:28:55 GMT
Spooky !
This is exactly the team and formation I would select too
Are you reading Mr Saunders ?
|
|
|
|
Post by senna34165 on Sept 5, 2017 10:37:47 GMT
Spooky ! This is exactly the team and formation I would select too Are you reading Mr Saunders ? No it isn't, you're justin awe of the graphic 
What package is that in hammerstone
|
|
|
|
Post by senna34165 on Sept 5, 2017 10:39:00 GMT
So, after a disappointing performance against Hartlepool its important we respond with a re-juvinated approach being careful not to slip into a rot. In light of that, this is the team I would go out with: As a few people mentioned already, i think this would give us a better defensive core. DSY sadly needs to watch from the bench, but wouldn't be adversed to him coming on and bagging a winner against his old side. ![]() Please either re issue with the correct squad mumbers on, or, using 1 - 11 in traditional positions. God I hate OCD  |
|
|
|
Post by hammerstone on Sept 5, 2017 10:50:51 GMT
To be fair it was too much effort for squad numbers, you get the idea!
|
|
|
|
Post by skydweller on Sept 5, 2017 11:17:25 GMT
So, after a disappointing performance against Hartlepool its important we respond with a re-juvinated approach being careful not to slip into a rot. In light of that, this is the team I would go out with: As a few people mentioned already, i think this would give us a better defensive core. DSY sadly needs to watch from the bench, but wouldn't be adversed to him coming on and bagging a winner against his old side. ![]() So 2 midfielders, and probably our 2 slowest at that. Is this post a windup? 5-2-3? |
|
|
|
Post by senna34165 on Sept 5, 2017 11:53:12 GMT
To be fair it was too much effort for squad numbers, you get the idea! What software was it done in? |
|
|
|
Post by mrplow on Sept 5, 2017 12:18:06 GMT
Something fishy about 3 center backs in regards to our team.
|
|
|
|
Post by hammerstone on Sept 5, 2017 12:37:39 GMT
To be fair it was too much effort for squad numbers, you get the idea! What software was it done in? |
|
|
|
Post by jdh80 on Sept 5, 2017 12:58:41 GMT
Am I the only one noticing that the two wing backs are on the wrong sides.
|
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Sept 5, 2017 13:15:09 GMT
Am I the only one noticing that the two wing backs are on the wrong sides. And Beans and the Dutchman surely? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 5, 2017 13:24:21 GMT
And so the most boring genre of football threads gets a nerdy update?
What next?
Photo's of various crowd sizes to predict the attendance?
|
|
|
|
Post by hammerstone on Sept 5, 2017 14:43:46 GMT
I do appear to have been slap dash with positionings but you get the point.
As for the less less tech savvy on here l, I can do a chalk board version.
The crowd pic idea is good. I'd prefer to post a pic on aguess of the away teams coach in the car park. Can't beat a Scania!
|
|
|
|
Post by senna34165 on Sept 5, 2017 14:50:38 GMT
Am I the only one noticing that the two wing backs are on the wrong sides. All part of hammerstones cunning tactics |
|
|
|
Post by senna34165 on Sept 5, 2017 14:51:51 GMT
And so the most boring genre of football threads gets a nerdy update? What next? Photo's of various crowd sizes to predict the attendance? Oh dear. Is leader snoke making you read them all? |
|
