|
Post by ontheup on Feb 3, 2014 10:55:21 GMT
Sold to Margate for a four figure fee
|
|
|
Post by Sennockian69 on Feb 3, 2014 11:13:51 GMT
That's OK!
We have played Margate twice this season. ( Thanks to the thinking of Jose)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Tom Phipp
Feb 3, 2014 12:09:10 GMT
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2014 12:09:10 GMT
Ebbsfleet then to margate? Clearly playing for the money.
|
|
|
Post by exiled on Feb 3, 2014 13:28:05 GMT
Think we missed the boat here quality player yet to be convinced by Parkinson
|
|
|
Post by exiled on Feb 3, 2014 13:28:34 GMT
Think we missed the boat here quality player yet to be convinced by Parkinson
|
|
payno
Full Member
Posts: 218
|
Tom Phipp
Feb 3, 2014 15:36:14 GMT
via mobile
Post by payno on Feb 3, 2014 15:36:14 GMT
Shame we didn't get hold of him! Done well in his brief spell here got forward well, was dangerous from corners and set pieces and also chipped in with a few goals!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2014 17:15:03 GMT
Think we missed the boat here quality player yet to be convinced by Parkinson Parkinson is a Centre Back and looks good in that position whereas Phipp is a Central Midfielder. Don't think Phipp would get selected ahead of Philips or Brown and I assume that if he had been available following his loan spell then we would have signed him rather than Campbell.
|
|
|
Post by exiled on Feb 3, 2014 20:33:56 GMT
Think we missed the boat here quality player yet to be convinced by Parkinson Parkinson is a Centre Back and looks good in that position whereas Phipp is a Central Midfielder. Don't think Phipp would get selected ahead of Philips or Brown and I assume that if he had been available following his loan spell then we would have signed him rather than Campbell. Saunders signed Parkison as a midfielder who can play centre back just think that along with campbell and philips we have too many defensive players in the middle and could have with Phipp to take some of the burden off Collin and Attwood
|
|
|
Tom Phipp
Feb 3, 2014 20:43:30 GMT
via mobile
Post by stoneroldnew on Feb 3, 2014 20:43:30 GMT
Parkinson is a Centre Back and looks good in that position whereas Phipp is a Central Midfielder. Don't think Phipp would get selected ahead of Philips or Brown and I assume that if he had been available following his loan spell then we would have signed him rather than Campbell. Saunders signed Parkison as a midfielder who can play centre back just think that along with campbell and philips we have too many defensive players in the middle and could have with Phipp to take some of the burden off Collin and Attwood From looking at his stats on Woking website he played 20 games this season at Centre Back so not sure about Jay signing him as a midfielder.
|
|
|
Tom Phipp
Feb 3, 2014 20:48:22 GMT
via mobile
Post by daveu on Feb 3, 2014 20:48:22 GMT
Think we missed the boat here quality player yet to be convinced by Parkinson Maybe we just didn't want to pay a four figure transfer fee, and who knows what his salary might have been.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2014 23:33:55 GMT
surely Parkinson was a four figure fee thats why people are compareing?
|
|
|
Tom Phipp
Feb 4, 2014 19:56:36 GMT
via mobile
Post by ontheup on Feb 4, 2014 19:56:36 GMT
Scores 10 mins into his Margate debut
|
|
|
Post by farawaystone on Feb 4, 2014 21:43:59 GMT
subbed after 58
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Feb 4, 2014 22:38:00 GMT
surely Parkinson was a four figure fee thats why people are compareing? Presumable Phipp wasn't available when we brought Parkinson in, so it's not really a fair comparison.
|
|
|
Post by exiled on Feb 4, 2014 23:36:47 GMT
Disagree not brought in to replace either Watt or sobers at centre half but to play in the middle playing at back to cover injuries when he has played in the middle totally unconvincing esp the met police game where he was garbage.
|
|