|
Post by ontheup on Aug 16, 2013 13:58:22 GMT
Steve Watt is available again for tomorrow's game, Jay doesn't seem too sure whether to bring him straight back in. Personally I think we are much more self assured with him in, but then again should you change a winning team?
|
|
|
Post by toonarmy on Aug 16, 2013 14:03:19 GMT
Bring him back and give Sobers a 'rest'
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 14:09:22 GMT
He'll be in for Andrews - I'll have a pint on it with whoever fancies disagreeing!
|
|
|
Post by toonarmy on Aug 16, 2013 14:12:47 GMT
He'll be in for Andrews - I'll have a pint on it with whoever fancies disagreeing! I would love to take you up on that bet but I don't want the extra pint to spoil your already full meal before the match
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 14:15:51 GMT
You seem to be implying you'll lose T&C's - the punter must be at the game tomorrow for the transaction to take place before, during, or just after the game Ant eligibility rules apply
|
|
lunch
Full Member
Posts: 188
|
Post by lunch on Aug 16, 2013 15:07:11 GMT
You seem to be implying you'll lose T&C's - the punter must be at the game tomorrow for the transaction to take place before, during, or just after the game Ant eligibility rules apply Read more: maidstoneunitedfc.proboards.com/thread/2190/watt#ixzz2c92sygM3. I'll take the bet Ant. Watt for Sobers. Warning though, that extra pint may mean 2 stops on the way back!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 15:23:51 GMT
Best to clarify with people such as yourself, I do mean a pint of beer, not of chateaux neuf du pape
|
|
|
Post by dave41212 on Aug 16, 2013 16:52:16 GMT
Steve Watt will back in for Andrews. Sobers seems more assured when he's playing alongside Watt, and Watt is too good a defender and leader to leave out just because 'you don't change a winning team'.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 16:55:32 GMT
On the argument of not changing a winning team, we're back to the one up top/3 wingers/uninspiring centre midfield that would not have been a winning team on Tuesday
I reiterate: Watt for Andrews, Phillips and Brown for Lye and Saraiva, and Booth for Smith
The only doubt there is surely if it's Smith of the 3 wingers who misses out
|
|
|
Post by dave41212 on Aug 16, 2013 17:13:38 GMT
Would have to agree with that. 4-4-2 please Jay. I'd have Orlando on the bench, and bring him on later in the game so he can run against tired legs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2013 17:28:55 GMT
My thinking exactly So 4-5-1 with no Watt - and Lye running the midfield it will be then
|
|
|
Post by superstones on Aug 16, 2013 17:32:21 GMT
Come on Jay let's be brave
Worgan Sullivan/Sobers/Watt/Mills Hill/Phillips/Brown/Smith Booth/Collin
|
|
|
Post by toonarmy on Aug 16, 2013 17:50:59 GMT
Come on Jay let's be brave Worgan Sullivan/Sobers/Watt/Mills Hill/Phillips/Brown/Smith Booth/Collin My only change would be to start with Flish instead of Smith Sorry missed the right back position, I would go with Davies instead of Sullivan
|
|
|
Post by ontheup on Aug 16, 2013 17:55:07 GMT
Davies will start at right-back surely
|
|
|
Post by dave41212 on Aug 16, 2013 18:27:04 GMT
Jay said he thought Richard Davies has been doing well, so I don't see him dropping him.
|
|