|
Post by ontheup on Feb 4, 2013 22:20:12 GMT
Interested to read the Leatherhead report from Saturday and it seems to be more complimentary to our performance than our own report/fans/officials.
The report talks about wave after wave of attack in the first twenty minutes from the Stones. How Leatherhead equalised against the run of play, and somehow scored at the near post.
They talk about Flisher and King being a constant threat.
Granted we were not great on Saturday but I think we have been pretty hard on the team and negative. Personally I don't actually think we looked like losing the game until they had scored their 3rd and with 5 mins left it was pretty hard to get back into the game.
Let's get behind the team, they need us
|
|
andyc
Full Member
Posts: 143
|
Post by andyc on Feb 4, 2013 22:39:13 GMT
I didn't think it was that bad really and on balance we had a good share of a decent football match. When you lose you do tend to react with more emotion cos we all wanna win. But as I said in a previous post it was really a couple of mistakes that cost us. If we had seen the game out from 2-1 it would have been a job well done. We have played worse in my opinion and taken all 3 points.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2013 12:26:48 GMT
The main frustration for me was in the latter stages of the game we did not appear to be trying to get anything out of it. We had a free kick around half way, deep into stoppage time - surely we should have piled everyone forward for this, yet we've got several men behind the ball
|
|
|
Post by tim on Feb 5, 2013 13:05:10 GMT
Tut, we were protecting our goal difference!
|
|
|
Post by stewart on Feb 5, 2013 16:46:54 GMT
the only diference between the two teams on saturday was the defence
|
|