Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2024 14:29:00 GMT
2-1 2,345
|
|
|
Post by garstone on Oct 16, 2024 17:59:24 GMT
Stones 2 Slough 0 Att: 2208
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2024 13:14:21 GMT
Stoners 2 - Slough 1 Att 2,245
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2024 13:15:13 GMT
Stones 1 - Slough 1
Att 2,097
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2024 17:11:52 GMT
Just realised there is a fundamental flaw with the scoring structure of this game - it's easily gamed.
For instance, just predicting every game, gives you 46 points. Then you can gain 30+ points just randomly predicting the result - assuming an equal chance of win, draw or lose for each game. Or you can try basing your predictions on last season's record (24 11 11) and going for a ratio of 2-1-1 (w-d-l) instead. That's 45 points if you bias your predictions towards wins.
There isn't much point (ha ha) in bothering with the predicted crowd, as the results are totally unpredictable and you can be very close and still lose all points - anything gained there is a bonus. But the same isn't true about accurately predicting the score - some scores are more likely than others. Last season, for instance, the most common scores scores were: 1-1 (9), 1-0 (7), 2-0 (6) and 2-1 (4). So, on the assumption that this season will be like the last one, you can slightly game the system by always predicting 1-1 or, more positively, 1-0 or 2-0. As getting the correct score gives you 5 points, even if you only get two or three right, that's valuable extra points.
So, if you follow these 'rules' you're fairly likely to get at least 75 to 90 points. And, if you stick to predicting the most likely scores, you could easily add another 15 or so - bringing the possible total to 105 - which could easily be enough to get you into the top 10.
Without, strictly speaking, actually 'predicting' anything!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2024 17:18:07 GMT
And, in answer to the most obvious question, no, I'm not going to do this! Apart from just being too fickle and inconsistent to stick to it, it's already too late this season.
But next season - who knows?!
|
|
|
Post by Harry on Oct 18, 2024 7:09:53 GMT
1. - 0 to Stones Att 2,303
|
|
|
Post by jte on Oct 18, 2024 7:46:30 GMT
Maidstone 5 Slough 1 Att. 2176
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2024 13:08:33 GMT
Stones 4 Slough 1 Att: 2,223
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2024 14:53:44 GMT
Just realised there is a fundamental flaw with the scoring structure of this game - it's easily gamed. For instance, just predicting every game, gives you 46 points. Then you can gain 30+ points just randomly predicting the result - assuming an equal chance of win, draw or lose for each game. Or you can try basing your predictions on last season's record (24 11 11) and going for a ratio of 2-1-1 (w-d-l) instead. That's 45 points if you bias your predictions towards wins. There isn't much point (ha ha) in bothering with the predicted crowd, as the results are totally unpredictable and you can be very close and still lose all points - anything gained there is a bonus. But the same isn't true about accurately predicting the score - some scores are more likely than others. Last season, for instance, the most common scores scores were: 1-1 (9), 1-0 (7), 2-0 (6) and 2-1 (4). So, on the assumption that this season will be like the last one, you can slightly game the system by always predicting 1-1 or, more positively, 1-0 or 2-0. As getting the correct score gives you 5 points, even if you only get two or three right, that's valuable extra points. So, if you follow these 'rules' you're fairly likely to get at least 75 to 90 points. And, if you stick to predicting the most likely scores, you could easily add another 15 or so - bringing the possible total to 105 - which could easily be enough to get you into the top 10. Without, strictly speaking, actually 'predicting' anyt hing Don't tease me....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2024 14:56:13 GMT
I'm going to go with 2-1 to Stones in front of 2168, and JDL if you're going to talk dirty stats, let's do it properly but you have to buy me dinner first and we're not going to a motel this time...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 18, 2024 21:41:45 GMT
I'm going to go with 2-1 to Stones in front of 2168, and JDL if you're going to talk dirty stats, let's do it properly but you have to buy me dinner first and we're not going to a motel this time... I can tell deflection when I see it...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2024 2:27:53 GMT
Well it worked last time so I'm sticking with 2-0 to the Stones (v Slough).
Att' 2420
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2024 3:09:46 GMT
Stones 2-1 Slough Att. 2233
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2024 3:43:35 GMT
Stones 1-0 Sluff Att: 2192
|
|