|
Post by butlerisalegend on Jan 13, 2019 18:19:00 GMT
I am not convinced these deals were connected at all. Even if they are I don’t think we did too bad out of it. Robinson for 3k. That is decent in my book.
|
|
|
Post by jdl on Jan 13, 2019 18:28:50 GMT
Sounds like he's a lying wind up merchant. They had no right to lay down conditions while Losa was still under contract to us so the bit about them allowing him to stay at Woking is bullshit. Do you know this for a fact Daveu or is it just your opinion of the guy. I love the way Dave moans about others' use of hyperbole, but leaps straight in with phrases like "he's a lying wind-up merchant"!
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Jan 13, 2019 18:49:56 GMT
Sounds like he's a lying wind up merchant. They had no right to lay down conditions while Losa was still under contract to us so the bit about them allowing him to stay at Woking is bullshit. Do you know this for a fact Daveu or is it just your opinion of the guy. Speculation mate. That's why it started with "sounds like".
|
|
|
Post by moley on Jan 13, 2019 21:00:23 GMT
Maybe WE said that Loza could go once the Cards were out of the FA Cup, with the agreement of all parties.
But of course "doing the right thing" could never happen in football, could it?
Or maybe some of us are too cynical
|
|
|
Post by Better things to do in life on Jan 13, 2019 21:19:11 GMT
Whatever happened we will never know the truth and so are just left regretting Jamar couldnt come back to try another chance at hitting the net for us but accepting that for whatever reason it wasn’t to be And wishing him well at the Ricay.
|
|
|
Post by 61666 on Jan 13, 2019 21:34:27 GMT
Doesn't he still live in Norwich? Maybe simple geography is at the root of his move?
|
|
|
Post by jdl on Jan 13, 2019 22:32:51 GMT
Doesn't he still live in Norwich? Maybe simple geography is at the root of his move? Overheard a conversation about this on Saturday - including one of the posters on here describing Billericay as "in East Anglia"...
|
|
|
Post by royalstone on Jan 13, 2019 23:12:46 GMT
Doesn't he still live in Norwich? Maybe simple geography is at the root of his move? Overheard a conversation about this on Saturday - including one of the posters on here describing Billericay as "in East Anglia"... Essex has sometimes been included in definitions of East Anglia, including by the London Society of East Anglians.[note 1] However, the Kingdom of Essex to the south, was a separate element of the Heptarchy of Anglo-Saxon England and did not identify as Angles but Saxons. The county of Essex by itself forms a NUTS 2 statistical unit in the East of England region. Copied and pasted from Wikipedia so not sure how accurate but with the intention of avoiding another pointless geographical debate.
|
|
|
Post by gromley on Jan 13, 2019 23:28:56 GMT
Essex has sometimes been included in definitions of East Anglia, including by the London Society of East Anglians.[note 1] However, the Kingdom of Essex to the south, was a separate element of the Heptarchy of Anglo-Saxon England and did not identify as Angles but Saxons. The county of Essex by itself forms a NUTS 2 statistical unit in the East of England region. Copied and pasted from Wikipedia so not sure how accurate but with the intention of avoiding another pointless geographical debate.NORFOLK ENCHANTS!
|
|
|
Post by jdl on Jan 13, 2019 23:58:51 GMT
There is no argument.
The clue is in the names - Essex = east Saxons, East Anglia = east Angles.
Claiming Essex is part of East Anglia is like saying that Kent is part of Sussex.
'East of England' region is not synonymous with 'East Anglia'.
|
|
|
Post by royalstone on Jan 14, 2019 0:40:23 GMT
Best of wishes to Jamar. Too good a player for the National South (imho).
|
|
|
Post by sword65 on Jan 14, 2019 0:50:56 GMT
Overheard a conversation about this on Saturday - including one of the posters on here describing Billericay as "in East Anglia"... Essex has sometimes been included in definitions of East Anglia, including by the London Society of East Anglians.[note 1] However, the Kingdom of Essex to the south, was a separate element of the Heptarchy of Anglo-Saxon England and did not identify as Angles but Saxons. The county of Essex by itself forms a NUTS 2 statistical unit in the East of England region. Copied and pasted from Wikipedia so not sure how accurate but with the intention of avoiding another pointless geographical debate. And there's me thinking it was just a shit-hole.
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Jan 15, 2019 9:12:05 GMT
There is no argument. The clue is in the names - Essex = east Saxons, East Anglia = east Angles. Claiming Essex is part of East Anglia is like saying that Kent is part of Sussex. 'East of England' region is not synonymous with 'East Anglia'. So do you think that Charlton is in Kent? You can take historical over modern usage in one case if not both.
|
|
|
Post by jdl on Jan 15, 2019 14:59:10 GMT
There is no argument. The clue is in the names - Essex = east Saxons, East Anglia = east Angles. Claiming Essex is part of East Anglia is like saying that Kent is part of Sussex. 'East of England' region is not synonymous with 'East Anglia'. So do you think that Charlton is in Kent? You can take historical over modern usage in one case if not both. One is a histo-gyographical description based on geography and history of colonisation 1,500 years ago, the other is a recognition of administrative boundary changes when Greater London was created. Quite different.
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Jan 15, 2019 17:02:36 GMT
So do you think that Charlton is in Kent? You can take historical over modern usage in one case if not both. One is a histo-gyographical description based on geography and history of colonisation 1,500 years ago, the other is a recognition of administrative boundary changes when Greater London was created. Quite different. Things change over time. For example Mercia no longer exists, so it's not unreasonable to accept that the modern definition of other regions should change. Modern usage recognises the area from the North of the Thames Estuary as far north as The Wash as being East Anglia and after 1500 years, considering how populations spread and shift, who the original colonisers were hardly matters any more.
|
|