Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2013 18:27:01 GMT
So, the original post is a lie? So can we expect a new look to the Gallagher...that cryptic statement I assume someone was meant to show some interest in?
|
|
|
Post by nws on Mar 20, 2013 22:41:01 GMT
I think the tone of Dave U's post is dreadful. Why the need to put down a person by insinuating that he is not good enough for a certain level of football. What qualifies him to such an opinion If you want to question my right to an opinion, at least have the decency to address me directly. I'm fairly certain that having the right to an opinion has never been dependent on any kind of qualification. For what it's worth, I thought I was OKish for us, but in my opinion he didn't stand out as anything above the norm for this level which was why I expressed surprise that he could get a trial in the SPL. There was no insinuation involved, it was a pretty straightforward post and hardly a "dreadful" as you put it. Firstly, I was replying to Toonarmy who was on the forum at the same time as me so quite why I would address you is beyond me. When I said what qualifies him to such an opinion there was an implied part of the sentence meaning that you really don't have a level of experience or knowledge to make your opinion meaningful. However, that is just my opinion. By expeessing surprise that he got a trial you were saying that you did not think he was good enough. That I could live with but the fact that when others say anything a little negative about players or the club you are on their backs telling them not to be so negative. It seems you are allowed personal and negative put-down opinions on the ability of our players. A bit contradictory.
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Mar 20, 2013 22:55:14 GMT
You just make it up as you go along don't you. Unlike you I don't make personal criticisms of people who make negative posts. I may disagree but I never question their right to have those opinions, which is what you have just done with me. Maybe it's time to start practising what you preach instead of setting yourself up as judge and jury of just about everything on this board.
|
|
|
Post by nws on Mar 20, 2013 23:05:15 GMT
I haven't questioned your right to have an opinion. I have merely asked whether it is worth taking any notice of based on your previous knowledge and experience.
If I wanted to stop you having an opinion then I would get your posts deleted. That would be much more of an attempt to be judge and jury of what gets posted. Whoops.
You will also note that that I did say that my questioning of the worthiness of your opinion was just my opinion. The again, you don't really read things properly so I doubt it.
When you say you don't make personal criticisms where do I categorise the denouncing of what I said using filthy words?
When you say I make it up can you please tell me what denying something was written only to then go back, read it and realise it was said is if it is not making it up.
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Mar 20, 2013 23:12:59 GMT
Are you referring to what I've already explained was a typo. If so then you plainly do not read things properly since I never denied typing it. And I still don't see where I have used filthy language. In any interpretation, the word I inadvertently typed is pretty mild. I can only assume you are either highly puritanical or you are using an interpretation I have never come across.
|
|
|
Post by nws on Mar 20, 2013 23:24:04 GMT
When I complained that you had used a filthy word you said you had used the word tosh. Clearly you hadn't. In doing this you were effectively denying the use of such a word.
In one interpretation the word is not mild (i.e. the context in which it was used). If I am using an interpretation of the word you have never come across maybe it is time you went off and learned the words you use. Disliking the use of such slang vulgarity may make me puritanical in your viewpoint, David. That is probably why I disregard your viewpoint.
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Mar 20, 2013 23:34:40 GMT
How could I deny something I wasn't aware of, or are you calling me a liar now? And why are you only picking on me when there was a whole thread of words that were asterisked out. There is a lot worse language than anything I've used on this board but for some reason you have to take issue with everything I post.
|
|
|
Post by damon1969 on Mar 20, 2013 23:56:38 GMT
Concord may be a league above us (until next season) but with average gates of 200, definitely a step down I would say. Yeah according to non league matters website maidstone are currently 14 out of 250 in the global attendance stats he will come back ;D
|
|
|
Post by nws on Mar 21, 2013 9:06:31 GMT
How could I deny something I wasn't aware of, or are you calling me a liar now? And why are you only picking on me when there was a whole thread of words that were asterisked out. There is a lot worse language than anything I've used on this board but for some reason you have to take issue with everything I post. David. You have first claimed to have used a different word whilst simultaneously not bothering to check. You have subsequently claimed that the word used is not really filth and that I am puritanical. That is denial. I am talking to you about your use of your word because this discourse is with you. On another thread jt seems to think he is being clever by using implied swearwords and I am pulling him up on it. I have also put up a general thread about use of swearwords which is not aimed at anyone in particular but all those people who think it is clever. Please stop the, 'I am so victimised line' because it simply isn't true. The reason you feel most victimised is because you are the one who is trying desperately to pretend that you haven't used such a word.
|
|
|
Post by jt on Mar 21, 2013 9:08:33 GMT
All these anwsers and posts to Dave which again proves that NWS, you are indeed a c**t.
|
|
|
Post by nws on Mar 21, 2013 9:42:08 GMT
It is called discourse, jt. Obviously your tourettes prevents you form doing this.
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Mar 21, 2013 13:05:53 GMT
How could I deny something I wasn't aware of, or are you calling me a liar now? And why are you only picking on me when there was a whole thread of words that were asterisked out. There is a lot worse language than anything I've used on this board but for some reason you have to take issue with everything I post. David. You have first claimed to have used a different word whilst simultaneously not bothering to check. You have subsequently claimed that the word used is not really filth and that I am puritanical. That is denial. I am talking to you about your use of your word because this discourse is with you. On another thread jt seems to think he is being clever by using implied swearwords and I am pulling him up on it. I have also put up a general thread about use of swearwords which is not aimed at anyone in particular but all those people who think it is clever. Please stop the, 'I am so victimised line' because it simply isn't true. The reason you feel most victimised is because you are the one who is trying desperately to pretend that you haven't used such a word. To draw a line under this, I never once denied using the word. How can you deny something when you don't realize you've done it? I'm not in the habit of swearing, but I'm clearly more tolerant of others who do it than you are. There are a couple of words I object to in any context, but even then I don't constantly pull people up for using them. This is clearly a messageboard largely frequented by adults who don't need to be constantly rebuked by self appointed moral crusaders, espcially ones who at the same time think it's OK to call anyone who supports Gillingham scum.
|
|
|
Post by nws on Mar 21, 2013 13:53:17 GMT
Your denial of using a filthy word is a matter of record, as is your subsequent wriggling to deny and deflect etc etc. The fact that you are still trying to justify it by yet another means shows that you are still denying the obvious.
You constantly pull people up for merely having an opinion that is negative towards the club. Strange how you now rather arrogantly label me as a moral crusader for not approving swearing when you don't approve opinion.
|
|
|
Post by daveu on Mar 21, 2013 20:15:17 GMT
My denial is not a matter of record because it never happened. I explained that having re-read my original post there was a typo in it. that is not a denial, it's an acknowledgement of an error. Since you clearly refuse to believe my explanation the only logical conclusion is that you are calling me a liar, an accusation that I utterly refute and take great exception to.
Secondly, I have never pulled anyone up for having an opinion of any kind. I presume that you mean I sometimes disagree with them, which is my right. Expressing a counter opinion is not jumping on anyone. You're the one on here who has no respect for anyone else's right to express an opinion, indeed you told me I wasn't qualified to have one.
|
|
|
Post by nws on Mar 21, 2013 20:47:42 GMT
My denial is not a matter of record because it never happened. I explained that having re-read my original post there was a typo in it. that is not a denial, it's an acknowledgement of an error. Since you clearly refuse to believe my explanation the only logical conclusion is that you are calling me a liar, an accusation that I utterly refute and take great exception to. Secondly, I have never pulled anyone up for having an opinion of any kind. I presume that you mean I sometimes disagree with them, which is my right. Expressing a counter opinion is not jumping on anyone. You're the one on here who has no respect for anyone else's right to express an opinion, indeed you told me I wasn't qualified to have one. OK David, please take exception but after saying you had not used a filthy word (without bothering to actually check first) you then said this about the word used. "It is a word that is often used in the context in which I accidentally used it and means nothing more than a load of rubbish" That is a denial of using a filthy word. Here is an Oxford Dictionaries definition of pull someone up oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/pull%2Bsomeone%2Bup___1Note the bit about it being a British reprimand with an example of: 'she never failed to pull us up and tell us to stop'. Interestingly you tell people to stop carping on about negative things. On above definitions I would assert that you have pulled people up many times on this board. On the last part. You have a right to an opinion. I merely questioned whether it was worth taking any notice of and I also said this was merely my opinion. Sadly for you, I did not say you were not qualified to have an opinion. I questioned whether you were qualified anough to give an opinion that was worth considering. there is a world of difference. You need to learn it before making rushed and incorrect statements.
|
|